PetroCalcHubFree
Production EngineeringWell PerformanceIn-depth reference

Skin Factor Due to Reduced Crushed-Zone Permeability Calculator

sc=(kkdpkkd)12hpNLpln(rdprp)s_c=\left(\frac{k}{k_{dp}}-\frac{k}{k_d}\right)12\frac{h_p}{NL_p}\ln\left(\frac{r_{dp}}{r_p}\right)

Enter the required inputs, confirm the units, and run the calculator to solve s_c. Review the formula source and assumptions before using the result in engineering work.

Tabular solver

Inputs

Defaults provide a quick field-unit example for the equation.

8 variables

Your input values and calculation stay in this browser.

Engineering reference summary

Calculation context and source notes

Skin Factor Due to Reduced Crushed-Zone Permeability calculates skin factor due to reduced crushed-zone permeability for well performance workflows in production engineering. The page keeps the declared variables, units, source relationship, and output definition visible for technical review.

Use this formula when the listed inputs (k, k_dp, k_d, h_p, N, L_p, r_dp, r_p) are known and the assumptions behind the cited well performance relationship match the engineering case being checked.

Solves for

s_c (dimensionless)

Formula reference

Formula, variables, and default calculation

sc=(kkdpkkd)12hpNLpln(rdprp)s_c=\left(\frac{k}{k_{dp}}-\frac{k}{k_d}\right)12\frac{h_p}{NL_p}\ln\left(\frac{r_{dp}}{r_p}\right)

Reproducible default result

With the default values shown below, the calculation returns s_c = 24.953299 dimensionless. Defaults demonstrate the implementation; they are not recommended field values.

kmD

100

k_dpmD

10

k_dmD

25

h_pft

30

Ncount

60

L_pft

1

r_dpft

0.5

r_pft

0.25

Input definitions

k

mD

Formation Permeability

k_dp

mD

Crushed Zone Permeability

k_d

mD

Damage Zone Permeability

h_p

ft

Perforation Interval

N

count

Total Number of Perforations

L_p

ft

Depth of Penetration

r_dp

ft

Crushed Zone Radius

r_p

ft

Perforation Radius

Output definitions

s_c

dimensionless

Skin Factor Due to Reduced Crushed-Zone Permeability

k_dp

mD

Crushed Zone Permeability

N

count

Total Number of Perforations

Engineering use, assumptions, and limits

Use this formula when the listed inputs (k, k_dp, k_d, h_p, N, L_p, r_dp, r_p) are known and the assumptions behind the cited well performance relationship match the engineering case being checked.

Assumptions

  • Input values are representative for the well, reservoir, fluid, or equipment case being evaluated.
  • The declared units match the field-unit constants used in the formula.
  • The cited formula applies to the selected petroleum engineering workflow.

Limitations

  • The calculation does not replace a full engineering model or operating procedure.
  • Accuracy depends on the source correlation, assumptions, input quality, and unit consistency.

Common mistakes

  • Mixing unit systems without converting the inputs.
  • Using default example values as field recommendations.
  • Applying the formula outside the source assumptions.

Frequently asked questions

What inputs does the Skin Factor Due to Reduced Crushed-Zone Permeability calculator need?

The calculation uses Formation Permeability (k), Crushed Zone Permeability (k_dp), Damage Zone Permeability (k_d), Perforation Interval (h_p), Total Number of Perforations (N), Depth of Penetration (L_p), Crushed Zone Radius (r_dp), Perforation Radius (r_p). Enter values on the units shown beside each field.

What result does this calculator return?

The primary result is skin factor due to reduced crushed-zone permeability in dimensionless. The formula section shows the declared relationship, variables, and a reproducible default calculation.

What should I check before using the result?

Confirm the unit basis, source applicability, and input quality. The calculation does not replace a full engineering model or operating procedure. Mixing unit systems without converting the inputs.

Source and record status

Source metadata identifies the relationship implemented by the calculator. Check the cited edition, unit basis, and scope against the engineering case before operational use.

reviewedguidance published

Joshi, S.D. 1991. Horizontal Well Technology, Page 504.

Open source reference

Related in-depth calculators