PetroCalcHubFree
Drilling EngineeringWell ControlIn-depth reference

Pore Pressure Gradient - Rehm and McClendon Calculator

gp=0.398log10(dcndco)+0.86g_p=0.398\log_{10}(d_{cn}-d_{co})+0.86

Enter the required gradient and correction terms from the source equation. The calculator returns estimated pore pressure gradient.

Tabular solver

Inputs

Defaults provide a quick field-unit example for the equation.

2 variables

Your input values and calculation stay in this browser.

Engineering reference summary

Calculation context and source notes

The Rehm and McClendon pore pressure gradient relationship estimates formation pore-pressure gradient from drilling or formation-evaluation indicators used in well planning.

Use it for pore-pressure screening, mud-window review, and well-control margin awareness before detailed geomechanics calibration.

Solves for

g_p (psi/ft)

Formula reference

Formula, variables, and default calculation

gp=0.398log10(dcndco)+0.86g_p=0.398\log_{10}(d_{cn}-d_{co})+0.86

Reproducible default result

With the default values shown below, the calculation returns g_p = 0.94124 psi/ft. Defaults demonstrate the implementation; they are not recommended field values.

d_cndimensionless

2.8

d_codimensionless

1.2

Input definitions

d_cn

dimensionless

Normal Corrected d-Exponent

d_co

dimensionless

Observed Corrected d-Exponent

Output definitions

g_p

psi/ft

Pore Pressure Gradient

d_cn

dimensionless

Normal Corrected d-Exponent

d_co

dimensionless

Observed Corrected d-Exponent

Engineering use, assumptions, and limits

Use it for pore-pressure screening, mud-window review, and well-control margin awareness before detailed geomechanics calibration.

Assumptions

  • The Rehm and McClendon relationship is appropriate for the local basin and data type.
  • Input gradients and correction factors are calibrated to the interval being evaluated.
  • The result is checked against independent pressure indicators where available.

Limitations

  • Does not replace formation tests, calibrated seismic/geomechanical models, or pore-pressure specialist review.
  • May be unreliable where compaction trends, lithology, or stress conditions differ from source assumptions.

Common mistakes

  • Using a generic normal-compaction trend without local calibration.
  • Confusing pressure gradient with total pressure.
  • Using screening gradients directly as operational mud-weight limits.

Source and record status

Source metadata identifies the relationship implemented by the calculator. Check the cited edition, unit basis, and scope against the engineering case before operational use.

reviewedguidance published

Advanced Well Control, Watson, D., Brittenham, T., Moore, P.L. (2003)

Watson, D., Brittenham, T. and Moore, P.L. 2003. Advanced Well Control, SPE Textbook Series Vol. 10, Page 52.

Open source reference

Related in-depth calculators