Production EngineeringWell Performance
TEG Weight Percent in Glycol Dehydration Unit Formula
TEG Weight Percent in Glycol Dehydration Unit calculates teg weight percent for well performance workflows in production engineering.
How engineers use this formula
Use this formula when the listed inputs (m_TEG, w_absorbed, w_lean_water) are known and the assumptions behind the cited well performance relationship match the engineering case being checked.
Assumptions
- Input values are representative for the well, reservoir, fluid, or equipment case being evaluated.
- The declared units match the field-unit constants used in the formula.
- The cited formula applies to the selected petroleum engineering workflow.
Limitations
- The calculation does not replace a full engineering model or operating procedure.
- Accuracy depends on the source correlation, assumptions, input quality, and unit consistency.
Common mistakes
- Mixing unit systems without converting the inputs.
- Using default example values as field recommendations.
- Applying the formula outside the source assumptions.
Default example
Using the default inputs, wt_TEG equals 95 %.
m_TEGg
95
w_absorbedg
2
w_lean_waterg
3
Inputs
m_TEG
gWeight of Lean TEG
w_absorbed
gWeight of Water Absorbed
w_lean_water
gWeight of Water in Lean TEG
Outputs
wt_TEG
%
TEG Weight Percent
m_TEG
g
Weight of Lean TEG
w_absorbed
g
Weight of Water Absorbed
w_lean_water
g
Weight of Water in Lean TEG
Source and review
reviewedGas Conditioning and Processing, Campbell, J. M. (1992)
John M. Campbell. 1992. Gas Conditioning and Processing, Campbell Petroleum Series, Vol. 2, Page 341.
SourceRelated formulas and calculators
Effective Wellbore Radius of a Well in Presence of Uniform Flux Fractures
Well Performance
Effective Wellbore Radius of a Horizontal Well – Method 1 (Anisotropic Reservoirs)
Well Performance
Effective Wellbore Radius of a Horizontal Well – van der Vlis et al. Method
Well Performance