Damaged to Undamaged Productivity Ratio - Acidizing Formula
Damaged to Undamaged Productivity Ratio - Acidizing calculates damaged or stimulated to undamaged productivity ratio for inflow performance workflows in production engineering.
How engineers use this formula
Use this formula when the listed inputs (F_k, r_e, r_w, r_s) are known and the assumptions behind the cited inflow performance relationship match the engineering case being checked.
Assumptions
- Input values are representative for the well, reservoir, fluid, or equipment case being evaluated.
- The declared units match the field-unit constants used in the formula.
- The cited formula applies to the selected petroleum engineering workflow.
Limitations
- The calculation does not replace a full engineering model or operating procedure.
- Accuracy depends on the source correlation, assumptions, input quality, and unit consistency.
Common mistakes
- Mixing unit systems without converting the inputs.
- Using default example values as field recommendations.
- Applying the formula outside the source assumptions.
Default example
Using the default inputs, J_ratio equals 0.527658 dimensionless.
0.2
12000
4
24
Inputs
F_k
dimensionlessPermeability Ratio
r_e
inDrainage Radius
r_w
inWellbore Radius
r_s
inDamaged or Stimulated Zone Radius
Outputs
J_ratio
Damaged or Stimulated to Undamaged Productivity Ratio
F_k
Permeability Ratio
Source and review
reviewedWilliams, B.B., Gidley, J.L. and Schechter, R.S. 1979. Acidizing Fundamentals. Henry L. Doherty Memorial Fund of AIME, Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Page 6.
Source